President Is Rebuffed on Program for Children

The Bush administration violated federal law last year when it restricted states’ ability to provide health insurance to children of middle-income families, and its new policy is therefore unenforceable, lawyers from the Government Accountability Office said Friday.The ruling strengthens the hand of at least 22 states, including New York and New Jersey, that already provide such coverage or want to do so. And it significantly reduces the chance that the new policy can be put into effect before President Bush leaves office in nine months.At issue is the future of the State Children’s Health Insurance Program, financed jointly by the federal government and the states. Congress last year twice passed bills to expand the popular program, and Mr. Bush vetoed both.

Lackluster Legacy On Health Care

President Bush didn't dally on the matter of health care during last night's State of the Union address, but he did flick at some tired themes: tax breaks for individual health insurance buyers (as opposed to employers); pooled insurance policies that help small businesses save money by spreading risk; and the expansion of Health Savings Accounts, which allow consumers to sock away pretax dollars to cover medical expenses. Yet the one issue that didn't merit mention--the State Children's Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)--may likely be the linchpin of Bush's legacy on health care, both for small businesses and the Republican party. Twice last fall, Bush vetoed bills to double funding for SCHIP, a 10-year-old program that offers free or low-cost health insurance to children of low-income families. Last week, the House again failed to override the president's veto.

Veto Stands on Measure to Expand Health Plan

Democrats cited the nation’s economic problems as a reason to expand a popular health insurance program for children on Wednesday, but their effort failed as the House sustained President Bush’s veto of a bill to provide coverage to nearly four million uninsured children.
The vote for the bill was 260 to 152. Supporters were 15 votes short of the two-thirds majority needed to pass the measure over the president’s objections.

Hard choices on healthcare (LA Times)

By most accounts, the SCHIP program has been a 10-year success story. The number of uninsured children dropped steadily from 11.1 million in 1998, the year after the program began, to its lowest level of 7.9 million in 2004, according to U.S. Census Bureau figures. But the number of kids without insurance grew by about 1 million from the beginning of 2004 through 2005, and according to the Kaiser Family Foundation, half of the newly uninsured children came from families earning from about $40,000 to about $80,000 a year (based on a family of four). "It increased in the last year, probably because both adults and kids are losing job-based coverage," says E. Richard Brown, director of the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research.Some of those newly uninsured children qualify for SCHIP but their families are unaware of the program. In some cases, states with budget shortfalls have stopped enrolling children. And when a family loses employer coverage, their children must go through a waiting period of a year, extended in August by the Department of Health and Human Services from three months, before being eligible.What's certain is that SCHIP-insured kids get their checkups. Children in the program are more likely to receive preventive healthcare, specialty care and dental care than uninsured children, and their parents report fewer financial burdens, unmet medical needs and less worry about their children, according to a report in the August 2007 journal Health Services Research. "It has provided access to kids who wouldn't have had coverage," says Brown. "It's cheap, and it'll help produce healthy and productive adults. I don't know what more we could ask for."

Advocates tout rising support for child health plan

Democrats and healthcare advocates are expressing increasing confidence that their emphasis on expanding children's health insurance - a measure already vetoed once by President Bush - has succeeded in putting healthcare on the national agenda. They point to a new round of polls that found wide public support for the child health program. Proponents say the difference between the Republican and Democratic positions is stark, giving voters a clear choice on what many call the most important domestic issue in next year's presidential election.

SCHIP Redux

Sensing a political advantage, Democrats rushed Wednesday to move a health care bill for children back to the House floor, having made minor changes to win over more Republicans.
Speaker Nancy Pelosi said the House would vote Thursday on the new bill. Like the original, which President Bush vetoed three weeks ago, it would cover 10 million children through the State Children’s Health Insurance Program and increase spending on the program by $35 billion, for a total of $60 billion, in the next five years.
But the new bill would tighten eligibility for the program, generally barring the use of federal money to cover illegal immigrants, childless adults and children of families with incomes exceeding three times the poverty level: $61,950 for a family of four. . . .
Under the new bill, as under the previous one, the federal excise tax on cigarettes would be increased by 61 cents a pack, to a total of $1, and Mr. Leavitt said the administration still opposed that provision.

House Failure To Override Veto Good News For Tobacco

The U.S. House's failure Thursday to override President George W. Bush's veto of tobacco tax hike legislation is another break for the industry. The bill would have increased federal tobacco excise taxes the equivalent of 61 cents per pack of cigarettes. . . .
The $35 billion raised by the tobacco tax increase over five years would have offset the cost of expanding the State Children's Health Insurance Program. The bill's supporters said that by 2012, the expansion would have allowed the program to cover nearly 10 million children.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., already has promised to have the same bill back on Bush's desk within two weeks. Asked whether the bill might include an alternative funding source, Pelosi said simply, "no."
Bush vetoed the bill on Oct. 3, arguing that it would encourage families to drop private insurance. He has offered $5 billion that would temporarily increase the number of children enrolled in the program, but would reduce enrollment over the next five years.

Children’s Health Plan Focus of New Struggle

The Children’s Health Insurance Program has suddenly become a vehicle for an ideological struggle between President Bush and Congress over the future of the health care system.
But in the short term, members of both parties say, the broader outline of that struggle is likely to be reduced to a simple question: “Are you for or against children?” . . . . Representative John Shadegg, an influential conservative from Arizona, said, “This debate is the opening salvo in a battle over the future of health care in America.” . . . . Republicans say Mr. Bush’s opposition to the House and Senate bills stems from conviction and principle, not a political calculus. But, they say, he is not running for re-election and appears oblivious to the political risks for Republicans.

Paul Krugman: The Waiting Game

Being without health insurance is no big deal. Just ask President Bush. “I mean, people have access to health care in America,” he said last week. “After all, you just go to an emergency room.”
This is what you might call callousness with consequences. The White House has announced that Mr. Bush will veto a bipartisan plan that would extend health insurance ... to an estimated 4.1 million currently uninsured children. After all, it’s not as if those kids really need insurance — they can just go to emergency rooms, right?...

Children’s health must be nation’s priority (John Kerry on SCHIP)

We have been modest where we should have been bold. If we, as senators, don’t stand for insuring every child in America, then what do we stand for? If America can spend $10 billion each month in Iraq, surely we can also spend $10 billion each year on children’s health.
Even more troubling, the president has launched a disinformation campaign to denounce this bill as a larger Democratic strategy or plot to massively expand federalized medicine. He has stubbornly pledged to veto a bill he hasn’t even read. Apparently, confronted with a bipartisan compromise to extend health care coverage to half of the 9 million American children without insurance today, the president sees only a vast, left-wing conspiracy.

Senate Panel Adds Billions for Health

Defying a veto threat from President Bush, the Senate Finance Committee approved a major expansion of the Children’s Health Insurance Program on Thursday, with a majority of Republicans joining all Democrats on the panel in supporting the legislation.
The vote, 17 to 4, sends the measure to the full Senate, which is expected to take it up within two weeks. Mr. Bush has repeatedly denounced the bill as a step toward “government-run health care for every American,” describing it as a “massive expansion of the federal role” in health care, financed by “a huge tax increase.”